Change to Rules for Accreditation Find out more

overview and process

For education providers

Sections on this page


Accreditation of higher education providers’ (HEP) psychology programs ensures the quality of the psychology profession, with a focus on public interest and public safety.

The process of accreditation involves comprehensively examining HEP and their programs of study against the relevant Accreditation Standards.

APAC works through the accreditation process in conjunction with the HEP and we base that process on a point in time self-assessment by the HEP of its programs, as well as peer-assessment by APAC’s assessors.

We aim to make this process as transparent as possible, with an overall aim of helping improve the quality of psychology education in Australia.

HEPs that offer qualifications in psychology can apply for accreditation. Cycle re-accreditation assessments are undertaken every five years, with out of cycle initial accreditation assessments undertaken as required at any point within the five year cyclical period.

The following accreditation status may be granted to a psychology program:

  • re-/accreditation with or without conditions
  • accreditation revoked
  • accreditation expired

Any submission for accreditation of a new program of study which is unsuccessful in gaining re/accreditation with or without conditions, will have no accreditation status.

Cycle accreditation process

Program accreditation is the process of assessing whether a program of study meets the Accreditation Standards and produces graduates who have the knowledge, skills, and professional attributes to practice psychology safely and competently in Australia.

Every five years each HEP will go through a cycle re-accreditation assessment. The following timeline outlines the review process for that assessment.

Information session

Around 12 to 18 months before the site visit, APAC will reach out to HEPs whose accreditation is due to expire at the end of the following year. APAC will organise a time to conduct an information session which will provide the HEP all the necessary information to prepare for the re-accreditation assessment and upcoming site visit. All of the HEP’s staff members involved in the accreditation process are welcome to attend the information session.

Notification of intended application form

Around nine to 12 months before the site visit, the HEP will need to submit a notification of intended application (NOIA) to APAC.

The NOIA should:

  • confirm that the HEP will be making a submission for re-accreditation of the existing programs and accreditation of any intended new programs
  • acknowledge that the submission for accreditation and all required documentation will be submitted by a date advised by APAC
  • detail all programs to be assessed
  • nominate potential dates most convenient for a site visit to be conducted

APAC will review the submission and if anything needs to be updated, we will contact you and work through changes as required. A tax invoice will also be issued for payment of the accreditation fee after review of NOIA for the programs of study and campuses to be assessed. Please visit the resources page to download a copy of the schedule of fees.

Site visit confirmation letter

At least six months before the visit, APAC will send a confirmation letter to the HEP. The letter will detail the composition of the Assessment Team that will be assessing your programs of study against the Standards. APAC has a pool of qualified assessors who are approved by the APAC Board.

The Assessment Team usually comprises of:

  • an Assessment Team Leader, who is an experienced assessor and whose usual place of employment is not located in the same city as the HEP being assessed, is responsible for coordinating the assessment
  • further assessors as required
  • an APAC staff member
  • may include observers (including additional APAC staff).

Any potential conflicts of interest should be raised with APAC at this point. The HEP must then go on to confirm that it has no objection to the Assessment Team before we can proceed further.

Submission for accreditation

At three months before the visit, the HEP will need to submit a self-assessment and supporting evidence of how its psychology programs meet the Accreditation Standards. The submission for accreditation template can be found here. The HEP will also need to provide a draft site visit schedule.

Site visit

The Assessment Team will interview all the HEP’s major stakeholders. This is normally completed onsite and in person, however in some circumstances the visit may be undertaken virtually.

Accreditation Assessment Committee meeting

Following the visit, the Assessment Team will draft a report based on the HEP’s submission documentation and the observations made at the site visit. The report will contain any proposed recommendations for the programs and will be considered by the Accreditation Assessment Committee (AAC) at the next scheduled meeting.


Following the AAC meeting, the HEP is provided with an opportunity to submit a rejoinder to comment on any factual inaccuracies of the report and input any further information to demonstrate that its programs meet the Accreditation Standards. This could include information that was not available at the time of assessment or during the site visit.

Post rejoinder

The Assessment Team will review the rejoinder and revise any recommendations, as necessary. The report is then re-considered by the AAC, which may make a final determination for routine accreditation matters, under powers delegated to it by the APAC Board.

Formal correspondence is subsequently sent to the HEP and the Psychology Board of Australia (PsyBA) for an approval decision.

In the case of more complex issues, a final recommendation is made to the APAC Board.

APAC Board

The APAC Board reviews recommendations and makes a final determination outcome. Formal correspondence is subsequently sent to the HEP and the Psychology Board of Australia (PsyBA) for an approval decision.

Psychology Board of Australia

The PsyBA makes its own decision on whether to approve or deny the program as a program of study within the pathway that leads to registration as a psychologist in Australia.

What’s it like to have your learning and teaching, your facilities and your curriculum examined, and to have staff and students chat with our assessors? Associate Professor Linda Byrne is deputy head of the School of Psychology at Deakin University, where she was a key participant in the assessment process that APAC carried out there in 2020.

  • Video transcript